The Great Wheated Bourbon Blind: Round Two
Round One of the Great Wheated Bourbon Blind sent Maker’s Mark Cask Strength and Seelbach Wheated to the championship. It also eliminated Weller Antique 107 and a Larceny Barrel Proof that I poured myself at Heaven Hill.
That was enough to remind me why I wanted to do this blind in the first place.
Labels create expectations. Reputation creates expectations. Personal connections certainly create expectations. A covered bottle does not care about any of them.
Fifteen wheated bourbons entered the full blind. I tasted every one before revealing a single identity, then divided the results into three groups of five for the posts. The top two scorers from each group advance to a six-bottle championship.
Round Two brought another five anonymous samples—and the closest elimination of the entire competition.
Sample F
Color: Very light copper.
Nose: A little light but very pleasing, with caramel, light oak, mild cinnamon and vanilla.
Palate: Almost a carbon copy of the nose. A little oak appears first, followed by cinnamon, honey, caramel and vanilla.
Mouthfeel: On the light side, but acceptable.
Finish: A little leather lingers initially, but cinnamon and honey last the longest.
Score: 79.96
Sample F was not especially complicated, but it was delicious.
That distinction matters. Complexity can make a whiskey more interesting, but a straightforward pour that does a few things well can still be enjoyable.
F offered familiar wheated-bourbon flavors without much depth or weight. The light mouthfeel and relatively simple profile kept the score below 80, but this was still an easy whiskey to like.
Sample G
Color: Light copper.
Nose: Toasted oak, nutmeg, honey and buttery toffee.
Palate: Honey, light leather, cinnamon, nutmeg and buttery caramel.
Mouthfeel: Lightly creamy.
Finish: Quicker than I would like, though the flavors are good. Honey, oak and nutmeg linger.
Score: 82.03
Sample G had excellent balance through most of the tasting.
The honey, toasted oak, nutmeg and buttery toffee complemented one another nicely, while the lightly creamy mouthfeel gave the whiskey enough substance to compete.
The problem was the finish.
It was good while it lasted. It simply did not last long enough.
That would become painfully important.
Sample H
Color: Light copper.
Nose: Maybe the best nose of the competition to this point, with brown sugar, toasted oak, toffee and light cinnamon.
Palate: The brown sugar becomes honey and warms with light cinnamon, toffee and graham crackers.
Mouthfeel: Lightly creamy.
Finish: Not as strong as the rest of the tasting, but still solid. Sweet honey is balanced with cinnamon and toffee.
Score: 82.89
Sample H announced itself immediately.
The nose was rich, sweet and inviting. Brown sugar, toasted oak and toffee created the kind of opening that makes it difficult not to form an early opinion.
The palate followed through with honey, cinnamon and graham crackers, while the creamy texture helped everything hold together.
The finish was not quite as impressive as the nose and palate, but the rest of the pour had already done enough.
Sample H moved into first place in the group.
Sample I
Color: The lightest copper in the group.
Nose: Toasted oak dominates, with nutmeg, light caramel and vanilla behind it. I did not love the aroma, but I found it intriguing.
Palate: Cinnamon and buttered toffee rush through immediately, followed by honey graham crackers and vanilla.
Mouthfeel: Borderline creamy.
Finish: Strong. The cinnamon becomes a sweet syrup and lingers beautifully.
Score: 82.13
Sample I was a reminder not to give up on a whiskey too early.
The nose did not win me over. Toasted oak dominated, and the overall aroma felt less welcoming than the others.
Then I tasted it.
The palate came alive with cinnamon, buttered toffee, honey graham crackers and vanilla. The finish was even better, with the cinnamon turning syrupy and lingering beautifully.
The nose may have held the score down, but the palate and finish pushed Sample I firmly into contention.
Sample J
Color: Solid amber.
Nose: Toasted nuts and toasted oak appear early, with light caramel and vanilla behind them.
Palate: Caramel, brown sugar, hazelnuts, mild oak and vanilla.
Mouthfeel: Borderline creamy.
Finish: On the light side but pleasant, with brown sugar, caramel and nutmeg.
Score: 79.42
Sample J had one of the most distinctive profiles in the group.
The toasted nuts and hazelnuts set it apart from the sweeter honey-and-graham-cracker pours surrounding it. Unfortunately, distinctiveness alone was not enough.
The finish was too light, and the overall experience never became as rich or complete as the leaders.
It finished fifth in the group.
The Blind Rankings
Sample H took first place with a score of 82.89.
Sample I finished second at 82.13.
Sample G landed just behind it at 82.03.
Sample F scored 79.96, while Sample J finished at 79.42.
That meant H and I advanced.
G was eliminated by one-tenth of a point.
One-tenth.
In a blind involving 15 bottles, Sample G had delivered the seventh-highest score overall. Had the finish lasted just a little longer—or had one small detail landed differently—it might have reached the championship.
Instead, it became the first bottle out.
The Reveal
Sample F: Old Fitzgerald 7-Year Bottled-in-Bond
Sample G: Green River Wheated Full Proof
Sample H: Maker’s Mark 46
Sample I: Old Elk Wheated store pick
Sample J: Larceny
This reveal may have surprised me even more than the first one.
Maker’s Mark 46 won the group.
Not Maker’s Mark Cask Strength. Not a limited bottle. Not a difficult-to-find release.
Maker’s Mark 46.
It is commonly available, usually affordable and sometimes overlooked because there is nothing especially rare about it. Blind, none of that mattered. It produced one of the best noses of the entire opening round and earned its place in the championship.
Old Elk Wheated took the second spot. Its nose was not my favorite, but the palate and finish rescued it in a big way. The cinnamon, buttered toffee and honey graham cracker notes became more impressive as the tasting continued.
Then came Green River Wheated Full Proof.
This was one of the bottles I expected to contend. It has impressed me repeatedly, and nothing about this tasting changed my opinion that it is excellent whiskey.
But excellent was not quite enough.
The finish was shorter than I wanted, and Green River missed the championship by 0.10 points.
That is not a collapse. It is not an embarrassment. It is a brutally close elimination.
Old Fitzgerald 7-Year Bottled-in-Bond finishing fourth was another surprise. It was delicious but straightforward, with a lighter profile than I expected from a bottle carrying that age statement and that name.
Standard Larceny finished fifth.
After Larceny Barrel Proof failed to advance in Round One, the regular version followed it out of the competition in Round Two.
The Larceny family was officially done.
Moving On
Maker’s Mark 46 and the Old Elk Wheated store pick advance to the championship.
Green River Wheated Full Proof, Old Fitzgerald 7-Year Bottled-in-Bond and Larceny have been eliminated.
Maker’s Mark 46 may already be the biggest value story in the entire blind. It reached the final six while costing less than many bottles that never came close.
Old Elk advanced because its palate and finish overcame a nose that initially left me uncertain.
And Green River missed by the smallest possible margin.
Round One eliminated two bottles I expected to contend. Round Two eliminated another. At this point, the blind was doing a very effective job of ignoring my assumptions.
Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.
Copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.










