Quick Thought – Saturday, September 26, 2026: Judging by Appearances–God Looks at the Heart

Read

1 Samuel 16:1-13

But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him. For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.”
1 Samuel 16:7

Reflect

There’s no doubt that television plays a huge role in the way we view the world. Today, it’s more than even TV. Our young people are beholden more to what they see on their cell phones than even what we watch on television. Before we became so dependent on images, we relied more on what we read and, in the age of radio, what we heard. Now, so much of what influences us is determined by what we see, whether or not those images are true, complete or reliable.

Take, for example, the first televised general-election presidential debate, aired on September 26, 1960. Before television became such a dominant political force, voters learned about candidates largely through newspapers, radio reports, speeches and campaign appearances. But in 1960, millions of Americans were able to watch the two major-party presidential candidates debate one another on television. What they saw became part of the story of that election and an early indication of how powerfully visual media could shape public perception.

Republican Vice President Richard Nixon faced off in the debate against the Democrat nominee, Senator John F. Kennedy. Nixon had recently been hospitalized for a knee infection, and he had maintained an intense campaign schedule following his stay in the hospital. When he arrived for the debate, Nixon appeared tired and had a “five o’clock shadow.” Kennedy, meanwhile, was well-rested and clean-shaven. Though the two candidates were only four years apart in age, Nixon looked like an old man compared to Kennedy’s youthful appearance.

Republican Vice President Richard Nixon faced Democratic nominee Senator John F. Kennedy. Nixon had recently been hospitalized with a knee infection, had lost weight and had returned to a demanding campaign schedule. When he appeared for the debate, he looked tired and had a visible five-o’clock shadow. Kennedy, meanwhile, had rested and prepared carefully for the appearance. Though only four years separated them in age, the contrast on television made Kennedy appear considerably younger and healthier.

The debate itself was substantive, and both candidates made their cases. But Kennedy’s television performance was widely regarded as stronger, while Nixon’s appearance became one of the enduring stories of the night. Roughly 70 million Americans watched the debate, an enormous audience for the time.

A popular story developed afterward that television viewers believed Kennedy had won while radio listeners favored Nixon. That claim has been repeated for decades, although later scholarship has questioned how firmly the evidence supports such a neat divide. However, there were claims that Nixon’s running mate, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, believed that Kennedy had won the debate, while Kennedy’s running mate, Senator Lyndon Johnson, felt that Nixon had won. Lodge watched on TV; Johnson listened on the radio.

What is not in doubt is that television changed presidential politics. Candidates were no longer simply heard or read about; they were seen.

The debates mattered to voters, too. Later polling indicated that more than half of voters believed the debates had influenced their decisions. Television had made presentation, appearance and image part of political communication in a way they had never been before.

In the decades since, that trend has only accelerated. Today, we aren’t influenced merely by television. We live in a world of social media, filters, carefully staged photographs, retouched images and increasingly realistic AI-generated pictures and video. People can spend hours comparing their ordinary lives to someone else’s carefully edited highlight reel.

We see influencers who always seem happy, wealthy and perfectly put together. We see products photographed under perfect lighting. We see people presenting carefully crafted versions of themselves to the world. And sometimes we forget that packaging and substance are not the same thing.

Samuel nearly made that mistake when God sent him to the house of Jesse to anoint Israel’s next king. Samuel saw Jesse’s son Eliab and immediately thought, “Surely the Lord’s anointed is before him.” Eliab apparently looked the part, but God told Samuel otherwise: “Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature.” Samuel saw what was impressive on the outside. God saw what was inside.

Repeatedly in Scripture, we are warned not to confuse appearance with character.

  • “Charm is deceitful, and beauty is vain, but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised.” (Proverbs 31:30)
  • “Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:24)
  • “So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.” (Matthew 23:28)
  • “For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.” (1 Samuel 16:7)

It isn’t wrong to admire beautiful things or to notice appearance. God created beauty, after all. The danger comes when appearance becomes the basis for our judgment.

Packaging can be persuasive. So can charisma, reputation, status, advertising, eloquence or an impressive online persona. But none of those things necessarily tell us what lies beneath the surface.

As Christians, we have to resist the world’s tendency to value packaging over substance. That applies to what we choose to watch, listen to, purchase or vote for. It applies to the people we admire and the people we choose to associate with. And it should certainly affect the way we judge the people we meet.

Today, pray for the Lord’s wisdom and discernment. Ask Him to help you see people and situations with spiritual eyes, not simply noticing what is presented on the outside, but seeking the truth and character that lie within.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Reflection copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.

Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

 

Posted in Faith, Quick Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Southern Sports Stillhouse, Week 5: Ten Games, Two Bourbons, One Loaded Saturday

Southern Sports Stillhouse: Week 4

Three weeks into the college football season, a couple of things are becoming clear.

Scott apparently knows who is going to win and by how much. Doug knows how many points everybody is going to score.

Put the two of us together, and we might make one competent handicapper.

Last week:

Doug Scott
Straight Up 7-3 8-2
ATS 6-4 8-2
O/U 6-4 3-7

Year to date:

Doug Scott
Straight Up 22-8 27-3
ATS 15-15 23-7
O/U 20-10 10-20

Scott’s 27-3 straight-up record is ridiculous, and 23-7 against the spread isn’t far behind. But those totals have been another story.

Doug, meanwhile, is sitting at a perfectly mediocre 15-15 against the spread but has hit 20 of 30 totals.

Something has to give eventually.

Until then, pour something good and settle in. We’ve got five ranked-vs.-ranked games on this week’s Stillhouse slate and several others that could make some noise in the SEC and Big Ten races.

Raise a glass. Take a side.

First Pour

Scott picks Green River “Bottle Your Own,” which came in a little white jug from the speakeasy in Louisville.

The color is dark copper. The nose carries peach and marmalade, with lighter notes of caramel and vanilla. There are nice tears on the Glencairn.

The palate leads with peach and a hint of pineapple, with cinnamon and oak playing a big role. The mouthfeel is syrupy and viscous, and the finish brings a Kentucky hug with oak and cinnamon.

Score: 86.91

Doug brings out Jack-Son-Tucky Bottled-in-Bond, made nearby in Jacksonville Beach.

The color is light mahogany. The nose leads with creamy vanilla, warm cinnamon and brown sugar. Most Florida bourbons hit me with a dose of leather, but not this one.

It’s sweet, with hints of brown sugar, tart oak and red fruit, creamy caramel and light cinnamon. The mouthfeel is lightly viscous, and the finish is decent, with tart cherries, cinnamon and caramel leading.

Score: 84.41

On to the games.

No. 4 Ole Miss at No. 21 Florida

Records: Ole Miss 3-0 (1-0 SEC); Florida 3-0 (1-0 SEC)
Where: Ben Hill Griffin Stadium, Gainesville, Fla.
Kickoff: 3:30 p.m. ET
TV: ABC
Stillhouse Line: Florida -3.5
Over/Under: 58.5

Ole Miss comes into Gainesville after one of the biggest wins of the young season, a 32-24 victory over LSU. Trinidad Chambliss has been sensational through three games, throwing for 924 yards and giving the Rebels a dynamic element both through the air and with his legs. Florida has been just as explosive, averaging 54 points per game, with Jadan Baugh already piling up 458 rushing yards and eight touchdowns.

The biggest question for Ole Miss may be the health of running back Kewan Lacy, who injured his shoulder against LSU. Florida’s bigger concern is on the other side. The Gators gave up 39 points at Auburn, and Chambliss is considerably more dangerous than anything they’ve faced so far.

This one has shootout potential, but it may come down to whether Florida can get two or three critical stops rather than trying to shut Ole Miss down completely.

Intangibles: Ole Miss is coming off the emotional high of beating LSU and now has to go on the road against another ranked SEC opponent. Florida gets a packed Swamp and the chance for John Sumrall’s first true signature win as the Gators’ head coach.

Swing factor: Florida’s defense. If the Gators can keep Ole Miss somewhere around 30 instead of 40, their offense should give them a chance to win.

Scott: My heart says Florida, but my head says Ole Miss. We could probably be 7-5 unless we win a game we’re not supposed to win. Could this be that game? I think Trinidad Chambliss is the difference.

Ole Miss 38-31

Doug: I’m throwing caution to the wind here. I always think I’m jinxing the Gators when I pick them in big games, but something tells me Florida is due for a big win. I still think Ole Miss finishes strong this season and probably makes the College Football Playoff.

But the Gators have a team that can run with almost anyone. Jadan Baugh and the Florida offense will score just enough to offset the points the Gator defense allows.

The Florida crowd is the difference.

Florida 31-28

No. 1 Texas at No. 14 Tennessee

Records: Texas 3-0; Tennessee 3-0
Where: Neyland Stadium, Knoxville, Tenn.
Kickoff: Noon ET
TV: ABC
Stillhouse Line: Texas -5.5
Over/Under: 57.5

The No. 1 team in the country hits the road for the first time, and Neyland Stadium is not exactly the place anyone would choose for a gentle introduction to SEC road football.

Texas is 3-0 largely because its defense has been terrific. The Longhorns held UTSA to 143 total yards last week even while the offense struggled to find a rhythm. Arch Manning has an embarrassment of riches around him, including Trey Wingo, but Texas hasn’t consistently looked like an unstoppable offensive machine yet.

Tennessee is also undefeated, with freshman quarterback Faizon Brandon getting his first real national-stage test. The Vols have the crowd, and an early Texas mistake could turn Neyland into a problem quickly.

Intangibles: College GameDay is in Knoxville. Tennessee is 2-17 all-time against AP No. 1 teams, and this is the kind of opportunity that can define a season. Texas, meanwhile, carries the pressure that comes with the No. 1 ranking into its first road environment.

Swing factor: Texas’ offensive start. The Longhorns have survived sluggish stretches because their defense has been dominant. Falling behind early at Neyland is a very different proposition.

Scott: Tennessee is 2-17 all-time against No. 1-ranked AP teams. Texas is just too consistent. The Vols will end up being 2-18 after this game.

Texas 24-20

Doug: Texas really does have an offensive lineup to remember, led by Arch Manning and Trey Wingo, but its defense is even better. Tennessee may keep this close, but the Longhorns are just better at the end of the day.

Texas 27-20

Oklahoma at No. 2 Georgia

Records: Oklahoma 2-1; Georgia 3-0 (1-0 SEC)
Where: Sanford Stadium, Athens, Ga.
Kickoff: 3:30 p.m. ET
TV: ESPN
Stillhouse Line: Georgia -13.5
Over/Under: 45.5

This looked like a marquee game before the season. Through three weeks, the gap appears considerably wider.

Georgia is 3-0 and nobody has come within 32 points of the Bulldogs. Kirby Smart’s team has reloaded quickly and already looks like one of the most complete teams in the country.

Oklahoma is 2-1 and coming off a game in which it barely survived New Mexico. Quarterback John Mateer remains dangerous because of his ability to extend plays and hurt defenses with his legs, but the Sooners have struggled to finish drives consistently.

Against most teams, Mateer’s improvisation can cover some flaws. Against Georgia’s speed and discipline, it can also turn into sacks, turnovers and long-yardage situations.

Intangibles: This is Oklahoma’s first trip to Sanford Stadium and only the second meeting between the programs. The first was Georgia’s 54-48 Rose Bowl overtime win after the 2017 season. The atmosphere between the hedges won’t make Oklahoma’s offensive problems any easier.

Swing factor: Oklahoma’s ability to finish drives. Field goals — or empty possessions — won’t keep the Sooners in this game.

Scott: This could be a blowout. I expect the Sooners to get embarrassed between the hedges. Georgia has too many weapons, and I think they’ll make Oklahoma look like Arkansas.

Georgia 45-10

Doug: I also don’t think this will be as close as we might have assumed before the season. Georgia has come together more quickly than I thought it would, and it’s looking like the Dawgs and Longhorns could be playing for the SEC title at the end of the year.

I don’t see the same level of blowout Scott does, but it won’t be close.

Georgia 31-10

No. 17 Iowa at No. 18 Michigan

Records: Iowa 3-0; Michigan 3-0
Where: Michigan Stadium, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Kickoff: 3:30 p.m. ET
TV: CBS
Stillhouse Line: Michigan -5.5
Over/Under: 39.5

If you like defense, field position and the possibility of a punt becoming one of the most important plays of the afternoon, welcome to Iowa-Michigan.

Both defenses rank among the nation’s best. Michigan is allowing only 220 yards per game, while Iowa’s identity remains what you would expect: run the football, protect the ball and force the opponent to earn everything.

Iowa rushed for 422 yards against Northern Iowa, with three backs topping 100 yards, while quarterback Hank Brown has yet to turn the ball over. Michigan counters with Bryce Underwood, who has thrown for 504 yards and added 156 on the ground.

Michigan has more explosiveness. Iowa would probably prefer nobody use that word at all Saturday.

Intangibles: Michigan has won four straight in the series, and Iowa hasn’t won in Michigan Stadium since 2010. The Wolverines also get the Big House for their Big Ten opener.

Swing factor: First-down efficiency. If Iowa stays ahead of the chains, it can shrink the game and put pressure on Michigan. If the Hawkeyes are consistently facing third-and-long, Michigan’s defense can take over.

Scott: I can’t stand Michigan. They haven’t really played anyone, and that includes Oklahoma. The Wolverines win a higher-scoring affair than most people expect.

Michigan 27-24

Doug: After the Wolverines escaped against Western Michigan, they’ve looked like a much different and more confident team. Iowa likes a physical, low-scoring game, and that’s what I expect to see.

Michigan wins a fairly close one.

Michigan 20-13

Vanderbilt at Auburn

Records: Vanderbilt 3-0; Auburn 2-1 (0-1 SEC)
Where: Jordan-Hare Stadium, Auburn, Ala.
Kickoff: 4:15 p.m. ET
TV: SEC Network
Stillhouse Line: Auburn -9.5
Over/Under: 52.5

Vanderbilt may be 3-0, but the Commodores arrive at Auburn in unusual fashion. They trailed NC State by 17 points multiple times last week and led for exactly one second — the one that mattered — after recovering a fumble in the end zone for the winning touchdown.

Freshman quarterback Jared Curtis accounted for 341 total yards in his first start. Now he gets his first road start, and it comes at Jordan-Hare Stadium.

Auburn needs to recover quickly from a 44-39 home loss to Florida. Byrum Brown is the centerpiece of Alex Golesh’s offense and can stress Vanderbilt with both his arm and his legs. If Auburn gets rolling early, Curtis may find himself having to throw in a much less friendly environment than he saw last week.

Intangibles: It’s Auburn’s Homecoming, Vanderbilt’s first road game and Curtis’ first SEC road start. Auburn is also coming off a painful loss in a game it had every chance to win.

Swing factor: Jared Curtis’ composure. Vanderbilt doesn’t need him to be spectacular, but turnovers and negative plays could allow Jordan-Hare to swallow up a young quarterback quickly.

Scott: Vanderbilt is coming off a lucky win, and Auburn is coming off a heartbreaking loss. Auburn won’t stumble again.

Auburn 27-17

Doug: Vanderbilt is capable of surprising some more teams. QB Jared Curtis is the X-factor for the ’Dores, but Byrum Brown will one-up him and get the Tigers back into the win column.

Auburn 31-20

Bourbon Break

Scott picks Blanton’s Gold.

It’s grape, caramel and light cinnamon on the nose. Bottled in 2024, it’s sweet and smooth — a total caramel-and-vanilla bomb. It reminds Scott of a soft, sweet Kraft caramel.

The color is amber to light copper. There’s not as much oak as you might expect out of a six- to eight-year single barrel.

“This is what bourbon should be.”

Doug picks Florida Victorious Fourth Char, a 96-proof small batch finished with oak staves.

This one is almost double-sourced — made for Florida Victorious by Bespoke Spirits, which sources its juice from MGP.

It’s light- to mid-copper in color, and the nose carries traditional notes of caramel and vanilla, baking spice and a soft balance of toasted oak.

The palate leads with brown sugar, cinnamon, nutmeg and a touch of anise. The mouthfeel suffers somewhat from being proofed down to 96, but it’s still decent.

The finish might be the weakest part of the pour, but it’s not terrible — all the flavors from the palate are there, just in lesser degrees.

Back to football.

Wisconsin at No. 13 Penn State

Records: Wisconsin 2-1; Penn State 3-0
Where: Beaver Stadium, University Park, Pa.
Kickoff: 5 p.m. ET
TV: Peacock
Stillhouse Line: Penn State -10.5
Over/Under: 44.5

Wisconsin enters Big Ten play at 2-1 after blowing out Eastern Michigan 54-10, but Happy Valley represents a dramatic increase in difficulty.

Quarterback Colton Joseph has thrown for 752 yards for the Badgers, while Abu Sama III gives them a running-game option that Penn State knows well. Sama transferred from Iowa State, as did Penn State running back Carson Hansen, adding a little familiarity to a game between programs that already prefer physical football.

Penn State is 3-0 and has won six straight against Wisconsin. If the Badgers are going to make this interesting, they’ll need to establish the run and keep the Nittany Lions from turning it into a game where Wisconsin has to chase points.

Intangibles: It’s Penn State’s Homecoming and helmet-stripe game, and Beaver Stadium is a difficult place to open conference play. Wisconsin hasn’t beaten Penn State since 2011.

Swing factor: Wisconsin’s running game. If the Badgers can consistently stay in manageable down-and-distance situations, this can become the kind of ugly game they want.

Scott: Wisconsin doesn’t look very good this year, and Penn State looks like a possible contender. The home-field advantage favors the Nittany Lions.

Penn State 31-21

Doug: Penn State could run the Badgers off the field, but I’m foreseeing a bit of a defensive battle. Even so, Penn State should dominate Wisconsin in a relatively low-scoring game.

Penn State 28-14

South Carolina at No. 8 Alabama

Records: South Carolina 2-1 (0-1 SEC); Alabama 3-0 (1-0 SEC)
Where: Bryant-Denny Stadium, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Kickoff: 7 p.m. ET
TV: ESPN
Stillhouse Line: Alabama -12.5
Over/Under: 54.5

Alabama is undefeated, although the Crimson Tide have developed a habit of making things more interesting than necessary.

They trailed Florida State 21-6 last week before scoring 20 unanswered points late in the first half and eventually winning 50-36. That came one week after Alabama exploded in the second half against Kentucky.

Freshman quarterback Keelon Russell continues to grow into the job, but South Carolina brings one of the conference’s most dangerous quarterbacks in LaNorris Sellers. The Gamecocks led Mississippi State 16-0 last week before the Bulldogs stormed back for a 41-34 win.

South Carolina has enough athleticism to make Alabama uncomfortable. The question is whether it can do it for four quarters.

Intangibles: Alabama is playing its first SEC home game of the season. South Carolina, meanwhile, has to recover mentally from blowing a 16-point lead and now enters Bryant-Denny against an Alabama team that has already shown it can erase deficits in a hurry.

Swing factor: Alabama’s first quarter. Eventually waking up has worked so far. Against better SEC teams, continuing to spot opponents early leads is going to become dangerous.

Scott: Alabama got surprised in the first half against Florida State, but that won’t happen two weeks in a row. This could be high scoring, but the Tide rolls.

Alabama 44-30

Doug: LaNorris Sellers can keep the Tide honest, but eventually Alabama tends to have its way, especially at home. Keelon Russell will have a big week, and the Tide should roll into Mississippi State undefeated.

Alabama 38-21

No. 23 Texas A&M at No. 10 LSU

Records: Texas A&M 2-1 (0-1 SEC); LSU 2-1 (0-1 SEC)
Where: Tiger Stadium, Baton Rouge, La.
Kickoff: 7:30 p.m. ET
TV: ABC
Stillhouse Line: LSU -7.5
Over/Under: 53.5

A week ago, both of these teams were in the Top 10. Now one of them is about to leave September with two SEC losses.

Texas A&M was stunned 31-21 at home by Kentucky, while LSU lost 32-24 at Ole Miss. That makes this one of the highest-pressure games of the weekend.

A&M quarterback Marcel Reed has thrown for 632 yards and six touchdowns while remaining a threat with his legs. LSU’s Sam Leavitt has produced more total offense but struggled through the air at Ole Miss, throwing for only 158 yards with a touchdown and an interception.

LSU also enters the game shorthanded. Safety Dashawn Spears is out for the season, while tight end Trey’Dez Green is expected to miss time.

The Tigers do, however, have Dilin Jones in the backfield and Death Valley at night.

Intangibles: LSU has won 25 of its last 27 night games in Tiger Stadium, but Texas A&M won 49-25 in this building last season and has taken the last two meetings. Both teams know another conference loss this early would make the rest of the season extremely unforgiving.

Swing factor: Sam Leavitt’s passing game. His mobility is dangerous, but LSU needs more than 158 passing yards if A&M succeeds in making the Tigers one-dimensional.

Scott: Death Valley at night. That’s a brutal place to play a road game. Lane Kiffin is probably pissed, and he’ll take it out on the Aggies.

LSU 27-10

Doug: LSU’s loss at Ole Miss undoubtedly stings, but nothing cheers a team up more than a win over a hated rival. QB Sam Leavitt and RB Dilin Jones will get back on track.

LSU 31-20

No. 20 Oregon at No. 12 USC

Records: Oregon 2-1; USC 4-0 (1-0 Big Ten)
Where: Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, Los Angeles, Calif.
Kickoff: 7:30 p.m. ET
TV: NBC
Stillhouse Line: Oregon -1.5
Over/Under: 62.5

If Iowa-Michigan is for people who love punting, Oregon-USC is for everybody else.

Dante Moore and Jayden Maiava give this game two of the most talented quarterbacks in college football. Moore has been sharp for Oregon despite the Ducks’ early loss, while Maiava has already pushed USC to 4-0 and has the Trojans’ offense looking dangerous again.

The interesting part is the pressure on Oregon. The Ducks have won four straight in this series, six of the last seven and eight of the last 10, but USC appears considerably more dangerous than the versions Oregon has been beating.

The Trojans have the better record. Oregon is still favored.

That tells you about all you need to know about how close this matchup looks.

Intangibles: USC gets the Coliseum, but recent history belongs to Oregon. The Ducks are also 9-0 in Big Ten conference road games since joining the league. For a 2-1 Oregon team with playoff expectations, this already feels close to a must-have.

Swing factor: Which quarterback makes the late mistake. There should be plenty of offense, and one turnover in the fourth quarter could decide it.

Scott: USC is due for a defeat, and in spite of the loss, the Ducks aren’t that bad. They’ll get back on track.

Oregon 31-27

Doug: QB Dante Moore has been sharp, in part because of his stable of receivers. USC QB Jayden Maiava might be even better this year, having already exceeded the 1,000-yard threshold.

This might come down to the last team with the ball.

Oregon 35-31

No. 19 Missouri at No. 24 Mississippi State

Records: Missouri 3-0; Mississippi State 3-0 (1-0 SEC)
Where: Davis Wade Stadium, Starkville, Miss.
Kickoff: 7:45 p.m. ET
TV: SEC Network
Stillhouse Line: Mississippi State -3.5
Over/Under: 58.5

It might not have the name recognition of some of Saturday’s other games, but this could be one of the most entertaining matchups of the weekend.

Mississippi State has been one of the early surprises in college football. The Bulldogs are averaging 47 points per game, and quarterback Kamario Taylor has already accounted for 1,010 yards of offense and 12 touchdowns. Running back Fluff Bothwell gives Jeff Lebby another weapon and is averaging nearly 100 rushing yards per game.

Missouri counters with Austin Simmons, who has completed 47 of 68 passes for 652 yards and eight touchdowns without an interception. Jamal Roberts gives the Tigers balance with 300 rushing yards through three games.

Missouri’s 27-17 win over Troy wasn’t particularly pretty — the Tigers were outgained 323-224 and ran only 49 offensive plays — but they found ways to win with turnovers and special teams.

Mississippi State has looked more explosive. Missouri has been more efficient with the football.

Intangibles: This is Missouri’s SEC opener and its first road game against a ranked opponent this season. Mississippi State has already won twice on the road and now gets Davis Wade Stadium with its first 3-0 start since 2017.

Swing factor: Explosive plays. Mississippi State has lived on them, particularly with Taylor. Missouri’s best path is making the Bulldogs drive the field rather than allowing quick-strike touchdowns.

Scott: This is the toughest game of the week to pick. The question is whether Mississippi State is for real. The Tigers always have offense, but the Bulldogs are one of the coolest surprises in college football this year.

I think Mississippi State keeps it going.

Mississippi State 21-13

Doug: Both teams have mobile, gunslinging quarterbacks — Austin Simmons for Missouri and Kamario Taylor for Mississippi State. The Bulldogs’ offense looks for real and should score just enough to keep Mississippi State undefeated.

Mississippi State 31-28

Ten games. Twenty picks. Two bourbons.

By Saturday night, some of this will look brilliant, some of it will look ridiculous, and Scott will probably somehow be 9-1 against the spread again while missing every total on the board.

The bourbon, as always, remains undefeated.

Raise a glass. Take a side.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.

 

 

Posted in Bourbon, Southern Sports Stillhouse, Sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Do You Believe in Karma? A Christian Perspective

Do you believe in karma?

View all responses

Not really. At least, not in the way people usually mean it.

We tend to use “karma” as shorthand for the idea that people eventually get what they deserve. Do something good, and good things come back to you. Do something rotten, and sooner or later the universe sends the bill.

It’s a satisfying idea. It’s also not exactly biblical.

The Bible does teach something that can sound a little like karma. Galatians 6:7 says, “whatever one sows, that will he also reap.” Proverbs is filled with reminders that wise choices tend to produce better outcomes than foolish ones. Treat people badly long enough and relationships usually suffer. Live recklessly and eventually the odds may catch up with you.

But that’s not the same thing as saying the universe operates like some giant moral vending machine.

Insert one good deed, receive one blessing. Insert one terrible decision, wait for piano to fall from sky. Scripture is much more complicated than that.

Good people suffer. Bad people sometimes prosper. Job is practically an entire book devoted to dismantling the idea that suffering automatically means someone did something to deserve it. Psalm 73 wrestles openly with the fact that wicked people can seem to be doing just fine.

Jesus also rejected the assumption that every hardship could be traced directly to somebody’s wrongdoing. So while the Bible teaches consequences, it doesn’t teach karma.

And there’s an even bigger difference. Grace.

Karma, at least in the way we usually talk about it, says eventually you get what’s coming to you. Christianity says sometimes, because of Christ, you don’t.

That’s a very good thing.

If the universe operated strictly on a system where everybody received exactly what they had earned, I’m not sure any of us should be especially eager for the accounting department to open our file.

The Bible teaches that God is just and that our actions matter. We do reap what we sow. But it also teaches that forgiveness is possible, mercy is real, and people can change.

Justice matters. Consequences matter. But grace changes everything.

So no, I don’t really believe in karma. I believe in something better.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.

Posted in Daily Prompt, Random | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Quick Thought – Friday, September 25, 2026: Real Freedom—What It Means to Be Free in Christ

Read

Philippians 3:1-14

Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own. But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.
Philippians 3:13-14

Reflect

Any time someone reaches the status of a legend, incredible stories are bound to emerge from that legacy. Some are true. Others are clearly fabricated. And still others can never be fully verified. Those are the stories we hope are true, even if we may never know for sure.

Consider one legendary tale about Abraham Lincoln. Known for the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared enslaved people in the rebellious states free and helped make emancipation a central purpose of the Civil War, Lincoln has long been associated with the struggle against slavery.

According to a story told by Steve Brown in his book Scandalous Freedom, Lincoln once visited a slave market. There, he saw a young woman being auctioned and began bidding on her. After winning the bidding, Lincoln supposedly told her, “Young lady, you are free.”

Not fully understanding, she asked what that meant.

He explained that she was free to say what she wanted and go wherever she wanted.

With tears streaming down her face, she reportedly answered, “Then what I want to say is that I want to go with you.”

It is a moving story, but I have never found reliable confirmation that it actually happened.

What I did find was a documented story about Lincoln helping secure the freedom of a woman named Nance Legins-Costley—about 20 years before he became president.

Nance had spent much of her life held in servitude in Illinois. Although Illinois was legally a free state, slavery and long-term indentured servitude still existed there in complicated forms. Nance maintained that she had never consented to being indentured and fought through the courts for recognition of her freedom.

After an earlier legal challenge failed, she eventually came to live with David Bailey. Bailey allowed her to live essentially as a free woman, but her legal status remained unresolved. After the man claiming ownership of Nance died, his estate sought payment from Bailey for her. Bailey refused.

The attorney Bailey chose to represent him was Abraham Lincoln.

The case, Bailey v. Cromwell, eventually reached the Illinois Supreme Court. Lincoln argued the case in 1841, and the court ruled that Illinois law presumed every person free regardless of color and that the sale of a free person was illegal.

As a result, Nance and her children were legally free.

It was one of Lincoln’s earliest documented legal efforts on behalf of freedom. Two decades later, as president, he would issue the Emancipation Proclamation and place the power of the presidency behind freedom for millions held in slavery in the rebellious states.

The Bible also uses the language of slavery to describe our condition apart from Christ. We are enslaved to sin and unable to purchase our own freedom.

That is where Jesus enters the picture.

Scripture tells us that we were “bought with a price.” Christ gave Himself for us, paying a price we could never pay and breaking the power of the master who once held us.

We cannot free ourselves from sin simply by trying harder. Our freedom begins with what Christ has already done for us.

And once we are free, what then?

That is where the old Lincoln story—whether historical or not—still offers a beautiful picture.

“I want to go with you.”

That should be our answer to Christ.

Freedom in Christ does not mean being released so that we can wander wherever we please. It means being freed from the master who once held us so that we can follow the One who redeemed us.

Paul wrote about “forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead.” He had been claimed by Christ, and now his life had a new direction.

The same is true for us.

Christ sets us free, not merely from something, but for something—to know Him, follow Him and keep pressing toward Him.

Our answer to the One who paid the price for our freedom should be simple:

“I want to go with You.”

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Reflection copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt and Charles Fulton.

Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

 

Posted in Faith, Quick Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Bourbon Cheapskate, Vol. 55: Double-Oaked Challenge Quarterfinals

At this point, the bracket is no longer filled with easy outs, lower-tier bottles or obvious mismatches. Every whiskey still standing has already survived at least one head-to-head matchup, and the field has narrowed to eight bottles that have all earned their place.

The quarterfinal matchups were:

#1 Old Forester 117 Series 1910 Extra Extra Old vs. #9 Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak

#4 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked vs. #5 Bondstone Heritage Reserve Quad Oak

#2 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B vs. #10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

#3 Lucky 7 The Frenchman vs. #6 Old Forester 1910

As before, the whiskeys went blind before the bracket came back into play. I tasted them as AA through HH, scored each individually, then revealed the identities and placed them back into their head-to-head matchups.

Four would survive.

And by the time the round was over, the top of the bracket had been obliterated.

Glass AA

Light mahogany color.

The nose is fragrant, but also warm. Nutmeg, light chocolate, caramel and maybe a hint of tree fruit. It isn’t overwhelming, but it’s inviting.

There’s a strong bit of spice on the front end of the palate — cinnamon, caramel, chocolate, a touch of butter, vanilla and a nice touch of sweetness.

The mouthfeel isn’t greatly oily, but there’s still some creaminess there. The finish lasts nicely, with tart oak, cherries and dark chocolate closing the experience.

This is definitely a strong sipper.

Score: 86.31

Glass BB

Solid mahogany color.

The nose is a little lighter, but still welcoming: buttery toffee, caramel, light nutmeg and whipped cream.

The palate is more defined. There’s spice from both proof and cinnamon, followed by tart red fruit, oak, caramel and a hint of dark chocolate.

The mouthfeel is substantial — rich and oily — and that leads into a finish that is tart, just a little sweet and very delicious.

Oak and tart cherry lead, with a little buttercream and a hint of cinnamon.

Another solid sipper.

Score: 86.58

Glass CC

Light mahogany color.

The nose is again on the lighter side, but filled with friendly and familiar aromas: light toffee, caramel, baking spice and vanilla.

Then the palate takes over.

Dessert in a glass.

Milk chocolate, buttery toffee, light cinnamon, brown sugar and sweet cherries.

The mouthfeel is the best yet — full and creamy — and the finish lasts beautifully as a result.

Chocolate-covered cherries topped with whipped cream.

I want another glass of this later tonight.

Score: 87.13

Glass DD

Rich mahogany color.

The nose steps things up with rich oak, dark chocolate, caramel and nutmeg.

The palate starts sweet, spicy and complex. Brown sugar, toffee, dark chocolate, cherries, cinnamon and light oak all show up.

It isn’t just the flavors. It’s the intensity and the layers.

The mouthfeel is nicely viscous, and the finish is satisfying, with sweet cinnamon, cherries and oak.

This is something that manages to be both enjoyable and challenging to sip.

Score: 87.61

Glass EE

Rich mahogany color.

This has the richest chocolate note on the nose so far. There isn’t a tremendous amount beyond that, although caramel and vanilla begin to show with a little time.

The flavor is absolutely delicious.

Spicy chocolate drizzled with caramel and vanilla, topped with lightly tart cherries and a touch of oak.

The mouthfeel is close to the best of the round, with a creamy base leading into a strong finish of tart cherries, oak, nutmeg and cinnamon.

Another one I want to revisit later.

Score: 87.78

Glass FF

Light mahogany color.

The nose is dark and inviting: rich dark chocolate, caramel, nutmeg, a touch of brown sugar and a hint of oak.

The palate leads with a combination of sweet honey and brown sugar, followed by milk-chocolate-covered cherries, modest baking spice, tart cherry and oak.

I’m really enjoying this one — maybe more than most of the others.

The mouthfeel is nicely creamy, and the finish lasts wonderfully, with tart cherries, dark chocolate and nutmeg.

Score: 87.34

Glass GG

Rich mahogany color.

The nose is potent, including a small blast of ethanol up front, followed by sweet red fruit, savory oak, cardamom and caramel.

The palate is rich and sweet. Spicy cinnamon and brown sugar are muted by tart cherries, cardamom, dark chocolate and a bit of oak.

The mouthfeel is nicely oily, and the finish is more than satisfying — long waves of tart fruit, bittersweet chocolate and muted baking spice.

Another fun dessert dram.

Score: 87.72

Glass HH

Light mahogany color.

The nose is sweet and inviting, although it steps back in the lighter direction: milk chocolate, nutmeg, oak and creamy caramel.

The palate might be the sweetest yet.

Brown sugar and honey lead, followed by sweet cinnamon, cherries, bittersweet chocolate and creamy caramel.

The mouthfeel is lightly oily, and the finish brings cherry SweeTarts, cinnamon and light oak.

Delicious.

Score: 87.02

The Reveal

The quarterfinal glasses were:

AA — Old Forester 117 Series 1910 Extra Extra Old

BB — Lucky 7 The Frenchman

CC — Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B

DD — Bondstone Heritage Reserve Quad Oak

EE — Woodford Reserve Double Oaked

FF — Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak

GG — Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

HH — Old Forester 1910

Now the bracket matters again.

#1 Old Forester 117 Series 1910 Extra Extra Old vs. #9 Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak

Old Forester 117 Series 1910 Extra Extra Old — 86.31

Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak — 87.34

The top seed is gone.

Old Forester was very good, with chocolate, caramel, spice, cherries and enough creaminess to make it a satisfying pour.

Bondstone was simply better.

The darker chocolate, cherries, creamy mouthfeel and stronger finish gave the Triple Oak enough separation to pull the upset.

Winner: #9 Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak

#4 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked vs. #5 Bondstone Heritage Reserve Quad Oak

This was exactly what a quarterfinal matchup should look like.

Woodford Reserve Double Oaked — 87.78

Bondstone Heritage Reserve Quad Oak — 87.61

Two heavy oak treatments. Two rich, dessert-driven profiles. Almost nothing between them.

Bondstone brought dark chocolate, toffee, brown sugar, cherries, spice and layered oak.

Woodford answered with rich chocolate, caramel, vanilla, cherries and a creamy finish.

Seventeen one-hundredths separated them.

Winner: #4 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked

#2 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B vs. #10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B — 87.13

Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength — 87.72

The special Woodford selection delivered exactly what I hoped for: chocolate, buttery toffee, brown sugar, sweet cherries and one of the best mouthfeels of the round.

It still wasn’t enough.

Bondstone Cask Strength brought more intensity, more spice and a long finish filled with tart fruit, bittersweet chocolate and baking spice.

The ten seed takes out the two.

Winner: #10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

#3 Lucky 7 The Frenchman vs. #6 Old Forester 1910

Lucky 7 The Frenchman — 86.58

Old Forester 1910 — 87.02

Frenchman was rich, oily and flavorful, with buttery toffee, red fruit, oak, caramel and chocolate.

Old Forester 1910 was sweeter and, on this night, just a little more complete.

Brown sugar, honey, cinnamon, cherries, chocolate and creamy caramel gave it the dessert profile I keep rewarding throughout this tournament.

Another top-three seed goes home.

Winner: #6 Old Forester 1910

The Final Four

And just like that, the bracket has been turned upside down.

The #1 seed is gone. The #2 seed is gone. The #3 seed is gone.

The Final Four is:

#9 Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak

#4 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked

#10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

#6 Old Forester 1910

The semifinals will be:

#9 Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak vs. #4 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked

and

#10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength vs. #6 Old Forester 1910

No #1. No #2. No #3. Just four whiskeys that earned their way here blind.

The next post finishes the bracket.

Two semifinals. One championship. One winner.

The Cheapskate Addendum

This is Bourbon Cheapskate, so I should at least acknowledge the obvious problem with this round:

There really aren’t any true cheapskates left.

My usual definition of a Cheapskate bottle is $40 or less. But the larger idea has always been finding something budget-friendly in an increasingly un-budget-friendly whiskey world.

By that broader standard, Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength deserves some attention.

I paid $47 for it.

That puts it above the official Cheapskate line, but not by much. And in this quarterfinal it won its head-to-head matchup, advanced to the Final Four and posted the best Cheapskate value score of the round at 94.11.

More importantly, it tasted like it belonged with bottles that cost considerably more.

This isn’t a case of saying, “It’s pretty good for the money.”

At $47, Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength is more than worth having on the shelf. It gives you a higher-proof double-oaked option with rich fruit, chocolate, spice, a substantial mouthfeel and enough intensity to stand up against much more expensive competition.

It may not technically qualify as a Cheapskate bottle.

But it absolutely qualifies as a bargain.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.

Posted in Bourbon, The Bourbon Cheapskate | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How Do You Write What People Actually Want to Read?

How do you write what people actually want to read?

View all responses

If I knew exactly how to write what people actually want to read, I suspect a lot more people would be reading this.

That seems like the obvious place to start.

The word “actually” does a lot of work in this question. It suggests that writers spend a considerable amount of time producing things people don’t want to read, which, judging by the internet, is probably true.

The problem is that people want to read all kinds of things. Some people want breaking news. Some want celebrity gossip. Some want recipes that somehow require 1,800 words about somebody’s grandmother before getting to the ingredients. Some want detailed reviews of bourbon they’ll never buy. Some apparently want to argue with strangers about college football at two in the morning.

There’s an audience for almost everything.

So I don’t think the secret is figuring out exactly what everyone wants to read. That’s impossible. If you try to write for everyone, you’ll probably end up writing for nobody.

I think the better approach is to write about something you genuinely care about and then respect the reader enough to make it worth their time. Get to the point. Tell a good story. Have something to say. Don’t use 500 words when 200 will do.

And, whenever possible, sound like an actual human being.

That’s becoming more important than ever.

I’ve written about faith, family, football, bourbon, teaching, memories and whatever random thought happened to wander into my head that day. Some posts get more attention than others. Sometimes the thing I spend an hour writing disappears quietly into the internet, while something I dashed off in 15 minutes gets read and shared.

I’ve learned not to pretend I understand why. Maybe that’s the real answer. You can’t always know what people actually want to read. You can only write something you’d want to read yourself, make it as good as you can, and hope somebody else feels the same way.

And if that doesn’t work, apparently there’s always celebrity gossip.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.

Posted in Daily Prompt, Random | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Quick Thought – Thursday, September 24, 2026: Living the Vision—Pressing Forward in Christ

Read

Philippians 3:1-14

Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own. But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.
Philippians 3:13-14

Reflect

At the timberline of Mt. Shasta in California grows the Shasta red fir. During its early years, heavy winter snow can bury and deform the young tree, bending and twisting it as it struggles to grow. Over time, as the tree grows above the deepest snow, its trunk begins reaching upward.

In the summer, you can still see evidence of those difficult early years near the base of the tree. The lower growth may be bent and misshapen, but above it the tree continues reaching toward the sky.

We are a bit the same as this tree. Our past may contain pain, mistakes and difficult beginnings, but coming to Christ changes the direction of our lives. We may still carry the marks of what we have been through, but those marks do not have to determine where we go next.

Paul understood that. He knew his past well, but he refused to live there. Instead, he wrote about “forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead.” His focus was not on what had already happened, but on continuing toward Christ.

So what does it look like to persevere in Christ?

It begins by recognizing that our perseverance does not start with our own strength. Just before these verses, Paul says he presses on because “Christ Jesus has made me his own.” Christ took hold of Paul first.

Because of that, we can begin each day by dedicating it to Him and end each day in thanksgiving to Him. It means comparing what we do, moment by moment, to the plumbline of Christ’s presence in our lives. That’s called Spirit-filled living.

Living the vision of Christ takes perseverance, but our successes do not define us and our failures do not disqualify us. What matters most is that we belong to Christ and continue pressing forward toward Him.

Like the tree that keeps reaching upward after years of being bent beneath the snow, we may carry evidence of where we have been. But because Christ has made us His own, we do not have to stay there.

We keep growing. We keep reaching. We keep pressing toward the goal.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Reflection copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt and Charles Fulton.

Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Posted in Faith, Quick Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Most Spontaneous Thing I’ve Ever Done

What’s the most spontaneous thing you’ve ever done?

View more responses

I’m not really known for being spontaneous. I tend to think things through, make plans and know where I’m going before I get there.

But one Tuesday in August 2015, Daryl and I drove to the courthouse in Marietta and got married.

We already had our church wedding planned for October, so this wasn’t exactly an elopement in the traditional sense. There were invitations, plans and a ceremony still to come. But we decided we didn’t really want to wait two more months to officially begin our marriage.

So we didn’t.

On August 10, we went to the courthouse and made it legal. Then, on October 10, we stood before God, our family and our friends at All Souls Anglican and celebrated our marriage in the way we had originally planned.

There have certainly been more adventurous things I’ve done. I traveled to Israel when I was 18. I’ve taken unplanned detours on vacations that became some of the best parts of the trip. I once changed careers and started teaching at an age when a lot of people are already thinking about retirement.

But spontaneity isn’t always about jumping out of an airplane or buying a plane ticket on a whim. Sometimes it’s simply looking at the person beside you and realizing there’s no particularly good reason to wait.

So we didn’t.

And for one August afternoon, at least, I was pretty spontaneous.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.

Posted in Daily Prompt, Random | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Quick Thought – Wednesday, September 23, 2026: Racing With God’s Confidence

Read

Philippians 3:1-14

Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own. But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.
Philippians 3:13-14

Reflect

I used to watch a lot more NASCAR racing than I do now, but I still enjoy watching a race from time to time. The raw speed with which these drivers travel over hundreds of miles is simply amazing. We may think that our commute to work in the morning is a challenge, but for a NASCAR driver, their “rush hour” is simply a day at the office.

My favorite driver of all time is Jeff Gordon, who raced more than 800 times in his career and won 93 of those races. Jeff was one of the all-time best, navigating tight traffic just inches from other drivers traveling at the same speed—often upwards of 180 mph and sometimes as high as 200 mph.

But a driver can’t successfully run a race by constantly looking in the rearview mirror. He needs to know what is behind him, but his attention has to remain on the track ahead.

Paul understood that principle long before anyone ever climbed into a race car. Earlier in Philippians 3, he lists the things from his past that once gave him confidence—his heritage, religious credentials, zeal and obedience to the law. But compared with knowing Christ, Paul says those accomplishments are worthless.

Paul also knew he hadn’t reached the finish line. He wasn’t perfect, and his past wasn’t perfect either. But he refused to live looking backward. He wrote that he was “forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead.”

That doesn’t mean Paul literally forgot his past. He talked about it often. It means that neither his former successes nor his former failures were going to determine where he went next.

The same is true for us. Yesterday’s victories can’t carry today’s faith, and yesterday’s failures don’t have to control today’s direction.

There is another important part of Paul’s message. He didn’t press forward so that Christ might accept him. Just before these verses, Paul says he presses on because “Christ Jesus has made me his own.” Grace came first. Paul was already Christ’s, and because he belonged to Christ, he wanted his life to continue moving toward Him.

In the midst of life’s race, we will encounter traffic, wrong turns and moments when the pace becomes frightening. There may even be times when we are tempted to spend too much time staring at what happened behind us.

But Christ calls us forward.

We don’t run to earn His love. We run because He has already claimed us as His own. So we keep our eyes ahead, pressing toward the goal and trusting the One who called us to the race in the first place.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Reflection copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt and Charles Fulton..

Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Posted in Faith, Quick Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tasting Tuesday: Double-Oaked Challenge — Round of 16, Part Two

The first half of the Round of 16 gave us one upset, two razor-thin decisions and four quarterfinalists.

Now the other half of the bracket gets its turn.

Eight more whiskeys. Four more head-to-head matchups. Four more bottles headed home.

As before, I tasted all eight blind before revealing the identities. The glasses were labeled Q through X, and I scored each one on its own merits before sorting them back into their seeded matchups.

This half of the bracket included some of the strongest bottles in the tournament, and one matchup proved just how unforgiving a head-to-head format can be.

Glass Q

Solid copper color.

The nose finally gives me something I’ve been hoping for: sweet oak, delicious buttery toffee, nutmeg and the potential of dessert in a glass.

The palate does not disappoint, although there are a few notes I’m still trying to figure out. There’s a little smoke, followed by cardamom, brown sugar, caramel, toffee, tart oak and cherries.

The mouthfeel is lightly viscous, and the finish lasts nicely, with honey, savory spice and red fruit.

Before I even look at the score, I’m thinking this could be the winner of the round.

Score: 85.01

Glass R

Solid copper color.

The nose is inviting: brown sugar, nutmeg, buttered toffee, caramel and vanilla.

The palate is equally sweet, with brown-sugar cinnamon, cherries, nutmeg, caramel and vanilla.

The mouthfeel is substantial, and the finish lasts nicely, bringing cherry SweeTarts, buttery caramel and cinnamon.

This is another pour that checks a lot of the boxes I’m looking for in a double-oaked whiskey.

Score: 85.72

Glass S

Borderline mahogany color.

The nose delivers plenty of sweetness, with butter, toffee, nutmeg and a touch of ripe red fruit.

The palate continues in the same direction: brown-sugar cinnamon, buttery toffee, tart cherries, toasted oak and creamy vanilla.

The mouthfeel is decently oily, and the finish is respectable, if not spectacular, with sweet spice, toasted nuts and tart fruit.

This is a very good sipper.

Score: 84.30

Glass T

Solid copper color.

The nose leads with savory baking spice and toasted oak, followed by some nice buttery toffee.

The palate brings a little smoke, but tart cherries immediately jump in front. The baking spice leans toward cardamom, while cherries and oak dominate the sip.

The mouthfeel drifts into the thin range, and that may prove costly. The flavor is good, but the finish is too quick and light, with cherries and spice hanging on briefly before fading.

Not bad, but likely vulnerable in this field.

Score: 81.48

Glass U

Great color.

The nose is also a winner. I usually don’t gravitate toward savory notes, and this one is loaded with them, but somehow the combination works.

I can’t completely describe what I’m smelling, other than that it makes me want the first sip.

Once I get there, the anticipation pays off.

There’s really nice oak, sweet cherries, brown sugar and barbecue notes. This whiskey is complicated, and I’m digging that.

The mouthfeel is modestly viscous, and the finish is solid, with tart cherries, cinnamon and caramel.

Another very good sipper.

Score: 83.92

Glass V

Light mahogany color.

The nose leads with milk chocolate, followed by savory oak, caramel and nutmeg.

The palate is rich and sweet, with toffee, chocolate, buttered caramel, cinnamon, nutmeg and light oak.

The mouthfeel is nicely thick and rich, and the finish is long-ish, with tart cherries, chocolate and cinnamon carrying the experience.

This is an easy whiskey to like.

Score: 84.03

Glass W

Light copper color.

The nose is considerably more inviting than the appearance suggests: buttery toffee, cardamom, toasted oak and tart cherries.

The cherries move to the front on the palate, with toffee, cinnamon and oak following.

The mouthfeel is lightly oily, and the finish is tasty and lengthy, with tart fruit, baking spice, caramel and oak.

This is a promising sipper and one of the stronger pours in the group.

Score: 84.68

Glass X

Solid copper color.

The nose is inviting, with brown sugar, nutmeg, buttered toffee, caramel and vanilla.

The palate is sweet, with brown-sugar cinnamon, cherries, nutmeg, caramel and vanilla.

The mouthfeel is substantial, and the finish lasts nicely, with cherry SweeTarts, buttery caramel and cinnamon.

This one lands squarely in the dessert-forward profile that has repeatedly done well in this tournament.

Score: 85.61

The Reveal

Once the scores were locked, the identities came back into play.

Q — Buzzard’s Roost Single Barrel Double Oak Cigar Bourbon
R — Old Forester 1910
S — Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength
T — Kentucky Credential Double Oak
U — Project 109
V — Pursuit United Double Oaked Bourbon
W — Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B
X — Lucky 7 The Frenchman

Now we drop them back into their matchups.

#2 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B vs. #15 Kentucky Credential Double Oak

Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B — Glass W — 84.68

Kentucky Credential Double Oak — Glass T — 81.48

Kentucky Credential had good flavor, especially the cherries and baking spice, but the thinner mouthfeel and shorter finish hurt it again.

The Woodford Father’s Day selection was more complete, with buttery toffee, cherries, toasted oak and a much stronger finish.

The two seed moves on.

Winner: #2 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B

#3 Lucky 7 The Frenchman vs. #19 Project 109

Lucky 7 The Frenchman — Glass X — 85.61

Project 109 — Glass U — 83.92

Project 109 had already survived the play-in round and once again brought one of the more unusual flavor profiles in the field, with oak, cherries, brown sugar and barbecue notes.

But this time it ran into something better.

Frenchman was sweeter, richer and more complete, with brown sugar, buttered toffee, cherries, caramel and a substantial mouthfeel.

Project 109’s run ends here.

Winner: #3 Lucky 7 The Frenchman

#6 Old Forester 1910 vs. #11 Buzzard’s Roost Single Barrel Double Oak Cigar Bourbon

This was the toughest draw of the round.

Old Forester 1910 — Glass R — 85.72

Buzzard’s Roost Single Barrel Double Oak Cigar Bourbon — Glass Q — 85.01

An 85.01 is normally the kind of score that sends a whiskey comfortably into the next round.

Not this time.

Buzzard’s Roost gave me sweet oak, buttery toffee, smoke, cardamom, brown sugar, caramel and cherries. It was layered, flavorful and satisfying.

Old Forester 1910 simply did a little more.

Brown sugar, nutmeg, buttered toffee, caramel, vanilla and cherries came together with a substantial mouthfeel and a finish that kept delivering.

Buzzard’s Roost drew the wrong opponent.

Winner: #6 Old Forester 1910

#7 Pursuit United Double Oaked Bourbon vs. #10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

Finally, we get an upset.

Pursuit United Double Oaked Bourbon — Glass V — 84.03

Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength — Glass S — 84.30

Pursuit brought milk chocolate, caramel, buttered toffee, cinnamon, nutmeg and a rich mouthfeel.

Bondstone answered with butter, toffee, ripe red fruit, brown-sugar cinnamon, tart cherries, toasted oak and creamy vanilla.

The margin was small, but it was enough.

The ten seed knocks out the seven.

Winner: #10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

The Elite Eight Is Set

The Round of 16 is complete.

Advancing from this half of the bracket:

#2 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B

#3 Lucky 7 The Frenchman

#6 Old Forester 1910

#10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

They join:

#1 Old Forester 117 Series 1910 Extra Extra Old

#4 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked

#5 Bondstone Heritage Reserve Quad Oak

#9 Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak

That gives us the quarterfinal matchups:

#1 Old Forester 117 Series 1910 Extra Extra Old vs. #9 Bondstone Limited Release Triple Oak

#4 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked vs. #5 Bondstone Heritage Reserve Quad Oak

#2 Woodford Reserve Double Oaked Father’s Day Selection B vs. #10 Bondstone Double Oak Cask Strength

#3 Lucky 7 The Frenchman vs. #6 Old Forester 1910

Eight remain.

Four more will be gone after the next round.

And at this point, there are no easy matchups left.

Enjoyed this? Subscribe and get future reflections, bourbon notes, and assorted nonsense delivered straight to your inbox.

Copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.

Posted in Bourbon, Tasting Tuesday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment