March Bourbon Madness: Best-of-the-Shelf Challenge—First Round Matchups 5-8

Opening Pour

The second wave of the Round of 64 brought another four blind matchups to the table. As before, everything was poured and scored without knowing what was in the glass. Some of these were tighter than the numbers suggest. A couple surprised me. And one bottle advanced despite not being at its best.

Let’s get into it.


🥃 Matchup 5 — Blind

CCC vs. VV

Blind Tasting Notes

CCC

  • Color: Light copper
  • Nose: Proof-forward, slightly muting the aromas; oak and vanilla most prominent
  • Palate: Peaches and strong cinnamon spice lead, with creamy caramel joining
  • Mouthfeel: Creamy
  • Finish: Decent, fruit and caramel dominate
  • Score: 83.03

VV

  • Color: Deep amber
  • Nose: Butterscotch, brown sugar, and light oak
  • Palate: Brown sugar forward, butterscotch lingering, nutmeg emerging
  • Mouthfeel: Creamy
  • Finish: Lovely, with spice and caramel most prominent
  • Score: 82.03

Reveal & Result

  • CCC: Stagg Jr. #24C (#8)
  • VV: High West Rum Cask (#57)

Winner: Stagg Jr. #24C (#8)
➡️ Advances to Round 2

Post-Matchup Thoughts
Closer than expected. Stagg’s proof showed up early and slightly suppressed the nose, but the palate delivered enough fruit-and-spice intensity to edge it forward. The High West brought sweetness and polish, but lacked the punch to finish the job.

What decided it:

Power and spice depth overcame early ethanol interference.


🥃 Matchup 6 — Blind

III vs. J

Blind Tasting Notes

III

  • Color: Dark copper
  • Nose: Toffee, graham cracker, savory spice
  • Palate: Butterscotch and brown sugar dominate; nutmeg and caramel follow
  • Mouthfeel: Soft but decent
  • Finish: Toffee and nutmeg close things out
  • Score: 81.81

J

  • Color: Mid copper
  • Nose: Caramel, chocolate, baking spice—slightly masked by ethanol
  • Palate: Heat up front, but subsequent sips reveal chocolate, caramel, and banana
  • Mouthfeel: Oily
  • Finish: Strong, with chocolate, caramel, and cinnamon
  • Score: 83.33

Reveal & Result

  • III: Old Elk Wheated (#25)
  • J: Jack Daniel’s Developer Series Sweet Mash (#40)

Winner: Jack Daniel’s Developer Series Sweet Mash (#40)
➡️ Advances to Round 2

Post-Matchup Thoughts
This was a good example of patience being rewarded. J wasn’t perfect early, but once it opened up, the flavor development surpassed III’s steadier but less dynamic profile.

What decided it:

Evolution in the glass and a stronger finish.


🥃 Matchup 7 — Blind

R vs. HH

Blind Tasting Notes

R

  • Color: Solid copper
  • Nose: “Dessert in a glass”—brown sugar, chocolate, caramel
  • Palate: Breaks down; thin mouthfeel limits flavor impact
  • Finish: Chocolate and caramel linger, but lack structure
  • Score: 79.64

HH

  • Color: Deep amber
  • Nose: More savory than sweet, with caramel joining oak and spice
  • Palate: Oak leads vanilla, nutmeg, and light caramel
  • Mouthfeel: Silky
  • Finish: Soft, caramel fades too quickly
  • Score: 77.25

Reveal & Result

  • R: Old Forester 1924 (#9)
  • HH: E.H. Taylor Small Batch (#56)

Winner: Old Forester 1924 (#9)
➡️ Advances to Round 2

Post-Matchup Thoughts
This one felt like a missed opportunity for both bottles. R teased greatness on the nose but couldn’t carry it through. HH was steady but lacked staying power. In the end, the stronger aromatic profile nudged R ahead despite the thin palate.

What decided it:

A superior nose was just enough to overcome palate weakness.


🥃 Matchup 8 — Blind

MM vs. E

Blind Tasting Notes

MM

  • Color: Mid-copper
  • Nose: Balanced sweet and savory—chocolate and baking spice lead
  • Palate: Brown sugar, floral note, rich caramel
  • Mouthfeel: Creamy
  • Finish: Satisfying; brown sugar leads, though shorter than expected
  • Score: 85.50

E

  • Color: Mid-copper
  • Nose: Strong butterscotch, caramel, vanilla, baking spice
  • Palate: Cinnamon up front, followed by sweet caramel and vanilla
  • Mouthfeel: Modest
  • Finish: Flavors linger nicely
  • Score: 81.92

Reveal & Result

  • MM: Brothers of the Leaf Blended Whiskey (#24)
  • E: Hard Truth Four-Grain Bourbon (#41)

Winner: Brothers of the Leaf Blended Whiskey (#24)
➡️ Advances to Round 2

Post-Matchup Thoughts
MM brought balance and texture. E was flavorful, but the mouthfeel difference mattered. In blind format, texture consistently separates contenders from pretenders.

What decided it:

Creamier mouthfeel and better overall balance.


🔀 Second-Round Matchups Created

  • Stagg Jr. #24C (#8)
    vs.
    Jack Daniel’s Developer Series Sweet Mash (#40)
  • Old Forester 1924 (#9)
    vs.
    Brothers of the Leaf Blended Whiskey (#24)

Closing Reflections

The theme emerging? Texture matters. High proof doesn’t automatically win—but it helps if the structure is there. A couple of bigger names survived without dominating. A blend advanced confidently. And a few bottles may already be reconsidering their seeding.

Round 2 is beginning to look dangerous. Come back on Saturday to see who wins in the next set of blinds in Round 1!

Note: This challenge recap is taking the place of the regularly scheduled Bourbon Cheapskate column. That will return on Thursday, April 9.

Copyright © 2026 Doug DeBolt.

Unknown's avatar

About Douglas Blaine

Capnpen is a writer who was a newspaper and magazine journalist in a previous life. A college journalism major, he now works as an English teacher, but gets his writing fix by blogging about a variety of topics, including politics, religion, movies and television. When he's not working or blogging, Capnpen spends time with his family, plays a little golf (badly) and loves to learn about virtually anything.
This entry was posted in Bourbon and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply